What follows is a private memo written about Obama's background during the presidential campaign which was submitted to the McCain Campaign, although I doubt they read a word of it.  It was also reprinted in blogs and websites all over the country.  Most of what is written has come true already.

TO:  Family, Friends, and Associates
FR:  Steve Baldwin
RE:  Latest Developments in the Presidential Race

Since the last memo I sent out, much has happened with the presidential race and many friends have asked me to send out an update.  Unfortunately, most of this info is alarming but you need to know this as you won’t hear about most of this from the media.   Please pass this memo on especially to those who are undecided.  

The following information has been completed on my own time and not on behalf of any group or organization.  It is based upon my own research and uses contacts I have in all branches of the US government, conversations with think tank leaders, policy experts, election law attorneys, sources within the McCain campaign, and top political consultants.

• Obama belonged to a Socialist Party.  New Information has come out confirming that Obama was a member of a radical socialist political party in Chicago called the “New Party,” composed of former Black Panther members.  Several documents have confirmed Obama’s membership as recently as 1996.  Obama’s supporters have attempted to “scrub” websites clean of this information but fortunately, researchers made copies of it before it disappeared. So far, the media is refusing to cover this story.
  

The following memo was reprinted in blogs and websites worldwide and led to the forming of new coalitions to opposed the threat of radical Islam.  Its calls for a world-wide movement to defend the West similar to what was done during the Cold War years in opposition to communism.

TO:  Conservative Leaders
FR:   Jack Wheeler & Steve Baldwin
RE:  The Creation of an Anti-Islamofascism Movement

Anti-Communism:  The Original Conservative Movement

One cannot write the history of the Cold War without acknowledging the key role played by the American Anti-Communist Movement.  It was a broad movement involving many different organizations that, for four decades, kept its focus on the defeat of the Soviet Empire.  And it succeeded.

Indeed, Anti-Communism was the defining issue that brought hundreds of thousands of people into the conservative movement in the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s.  There was a sense that this movement had to be successful if not only America but Western Civilization itself were to survive.

What did this Movement Accomplish?

The Anti-Communist Movement was formed after World War II when it was revealed that Soviet spies were operating throughout our government. This movement became one of the most successful political movements in our history.  

This article appeared in the Regent Law School Law Review and generated controversy worldwide.  While it has resulted in lots of threats and condemnation from the left, no one has been able to challenge the basic thrust of the article which is that homosexuals have a dangerous fixation on youth based upon its own literature, films, books, and newspapers.

Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement

Lately, the gay movement seems to be making large gains in its war on America’s Judeo-Christian culture. Gay characters have become the norm on sitcoms; it has become fashionable to attack the Boy Scouts; homosexual propaganda inundates many of our public schools; nearly all the mainstream religious denominations have "revised" their understanding of Biblical teaching concerning homosexuality; and the gay "rights" legislative agenda is succeeding beyond the advocates’ wildest imaginations. 

And yet the destructive impact homosexuality has upon Western Civilization is rarely discussed by columnists, reporters, religious leaders, politicians or by anyone else for that matter. Even some conservative publications choose to ignore the issue and instead have published articles arguing for greater tolerance of the gay lifestyle. 

Indeed, on the homosexual issue, conservatives seem divided between a "live and let live" attitude and one that concludes that the homosexual agenda will have to be curtailed if the Judeo-Christian culture is to survive. However, overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture. A vast amount of data demonstrating the deviant nature of the gay lifestyle is ignored by the media as well as the leadership of the psychological, psychiatric, and medical professions. 

While the media has portrayed Obama as an "education reformer," the reality is just the opposite. His agenda will Federalize education, remove all accountability, and probably send academic performance plummeting.

In the aftermath of Obama’s controversial speech to America’s school children, it is a good time to take a look at the agenda his regime has planned for America’s public schools and let me assure you, it’s an agenda that all Americans should be concerned about.

The mainstream media has spread the myth that Obama is a serious education reformer due to the fact he supposedly supports educational choice, merit pay for good teachers, charter schools, etc., but like so much else with Obama, the actual facts tell a different story. In short, the agenda Obama has set for America’s public schools will likely set our schools back decades. The notion his “reforms” will actually improve public schools is naïve, if not downright foolish.

Read the entire article

Good schools teach reading and math. Students in our Democrat-controlled schools can barely read and know little math. Therefore Democrats are dedicated to good schools.


We hear it all the time. Democrats are pro-public education; Republicans are anti-public education. It’s a durable myth so often repeated even many Republicans believe it. But the truth is Democrats have played a major role in promoting failed education theories that have placed California public schools among the nation’s worst. Indeed, the superintendent of public instruction has been a Democrat since Max Rafferty in the  1960’s and the Democrats have long controlled the vast majority of California’s local boards of education.

California is tied for last nationally in fourth grade reading scores on the most recent National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) tests. We are in the bottom fifth for fourth grade math scores on the same test. The millions of dollars our colleges and universities now spend on remedial education further demonstrate our K-12 system’s failure to teach basic skills.

One of public education’s biggest obstacles, I have often concluded, is its lack of an immune system to fend off foolish and untested ideas. As a result, bureaucrats and educational theorists waste not just the money spent on education, but our most precious resource: a generation of our children.

Take for example the recent results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Survey. Though low scores from U.S. students are old news, TIMSS is just another aftershock from the recent earthquakes that have rocked the educational establishment. For the uninitiated, TIMSS is the biggest and most thorough comparative math study ever produced. American math students ranked 21st out of 41 countries rated, well behind Japan, South Korea, France, Russia, and even Bulgaria.

Meanwhile defenders of Constructivist Math (or what its critics call the ‘New new math”), the movement that has swept math instruction in the last decade, are struggling to put the best face on this bad news.

For the record, the document that determines California’s math approach is the California Math Framework. The central features of the Math Framework are based on a teaching philosophy focusing specifically on child-centered “discovery learning,” group work, and an excessive focus on “real-world problems.” The current wave of popularity of these ideas dares from the early 1980s efforts of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics to promote them. However, these proposals were crystallized and given official clout in the influential 1985 California Math Framework.